发表于2025-04-12
Weihong Bao is assistant professor of film and media and Chinese studies at the University of California, Berkeley.
What was cinema in modern China? It was, this book tells us, a dynamic entity, not strictly tied to one media technology, one mode of operation, or one system of aesthetic code. It was, in Weihong Bao’s term, an affective medium, a distinct notion of the medium as mediating environment with the power to stir passions, frame perception, and mold experience. In Fiery Cinema, Bao traces the permutations of this affective medium from the early through the mid-twentieth century, exploring its role in aesthetics, politics, and social institutions.
Mapping the changing identity of cinema in China in relation to Republican-era print media, theatrical performance, radio broadcasting, television, and architecture, Bao has created an archaeology of Chinese media culture. Within this context, she grounds the question of spectatorial affect and media technology in China’s experience of mechanized warfare, colonial modernity, and the shaping of the public into consumers, national citizens, and a revolutionary collective subject. Carrying on a close conversation with transnational media theory and history, she teases out the tension and affinity between vernacular, political modernist, and propagandistic articulations of mass culture in China’s varied participation in modernity.
Fiery Cinema advances a radical rethinking of affect and medium as a key insight into the relationship of cinema to the public sphere and the making of the masses. By centering media politics in her inquiry of the forgotten future of cinema, Bao makes a major intervention into the theory and history of media.
Fiery Cinema 下载 mobi pdf epub txt 电子书 格式 2025
Fiery Cinema 下载 mobi epub pdf 电子书##英文水平不足以让我看懂他的深邃思想。
评分 评分##本书中包卫红老师将对早期电影史的情动脉络研究分成三个部分,也可以被看做切入分析的三个角度,即共鸣、透明和煽动。第一部分共鸣从早期声学影像技术的原理说起,结合武侠电影和新英雄主义风格的分析,并注意到催眠术和电影之火作为论据支撑的共通性,着重提出了本书的核心观...
评分##重写中国电影史和媒介史。低调,扎实,漂亮。
评分 评分 评分##重写中国电影史和媒介史。低调,扎实,漂亮。
评分##首先必须承认Affective Medium是个超级有意思的framework,基于Henri Bergson,将电影放置在观众(Subject)和表征(Object)中间。它不只是一个机械化的观看机制,让创作者主动得把故事和信息喂给被动的观众。当然可能好莱坞大部分老白中产阶级是这样,但我想,他们看了一部烂片也会愤愤不平吧。所以在不同的社会语境下,必定有一个东西把观众和表征串在一起。在包卫红的眼里,它就是情动。当然在现代性中,要谈语境,确实跨媒介的角度是很合适的。自己要写点农村放映的东西,包的研究可能第一个关注民国时期的农村放映,之前的研究都过度关注上海等大城市了,第五章还是很有帮助的。我不太喜欢第二章,虽然说电视词源上可能是千里眼,但是电视媒介的引入真的与老百姓集体对于通灵的兴趣有关?
评分Fiery Cinema mobi epub pdf txt 电子书 格式下载 2025