具体描述
Two renowned investment advisors and authors of the bestseller The Great Reckoning bring to light both currents of disaster and the potential for prosperity and renewal in the face of radical changes in human history as we move into the next century. The Sovereign Individual details strategies necessary for adapting financially to the next phase of Western civilization.
Few observers of the late twentieth century have their fingers so presciently on the pulse of the global political and economic realignment ushering in the new millennium as do James Dale Davidson and Lord William Rees-Mogg. Their bold prediction of disaster on Wall Street in Blood in the Streets was borne out by Black Tuesday. In their ensuing bestsellar, The Great Reckoning, published just weeks before the coup attempt against Gorbachev, they analyzed the pending collapse of the Soviet Union and foretold the civil war in Yugoslavia and other events that have proved to be among the most searing developments of the past few years.
In The Sovereign Individual, Davidson and Rees-Mogg explore the greatest economic and political transition in centuries -- the shift from an industrial to an information-based society. This transition, which they have termed "the fourth stage of human society," will liberate individuals as never before, irrevocably altering the power of government. This outstanding book will replace false hopes and fictions with new understanding and clarified values.
用户评价
##这算是布尔乔亚的国际主义宣言？只看了一点点加书评，辩证着看的话，还是不错的，比如对于教育的观点，让我反思，如果网络上已经有了很好的教育资源，那么对于辍学者，应该如何好好使用？最后，我还是反对作者的观点，信息革命和农业工业革命最大的不同在于，前两次是关于物质的，而信息是关于意识的。前者是物的可持续发展/再生产，后者是人的可持续发展/再生产。
评分##Another book blow my mind
评分##这算是布尔乔亚的国际主义宣言？只看了一点点加书评，辩证着看的话，还是不错的，比如对于教育的观点，让我反思，如果网络上已经有了很好的教育资源，那么对于辍学者，应该如何好好使用？最后，我还是反对作者的观点，信息革命和农业工业革命最大的不同在于，前两次是关于物质的，而信息是关于意识的。前者是物的可持续发展/再生产，后者是人的可持续发展/再生产。
评分##Another book blow my mind
评分##在那个时代能想到这么多确实很厉害了
评分##略豆瓣 naval推荐
评分##武断的论点太多，系统扎实的论据太少，论证过程太不严密，无法令人舒适地认同。有不少想法很有意思，值得深挖和讨论
评分##前半段非常精彩，考虑到写于上世纪更令人难以置信。可惜后半段质量差好多，完全可以精简下砍掉很多重复和与主线关联不大的部分就更完美了
评分##武断的论点太多，系统扎实的论据太少，论证过程太不严密，无法令人舒适地认同。有不少想法很有意思，值得深挖和讨论
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.teaonline.club All Rights Reserved. 图书大百科 版权所有