"My son has been erased." Those are the last words the woman tells Barry Sutton, before she leaps from the Manhattan rooftop.
Deeply unnerved, Barry begins to investigate her death, only to learn that this wasn't an isolated case. All across the country, people are waking up to lives different from the ones they fell asleep to. Are they suffering from False Memory Syndrome, a mysterious new disease that afflicts people with vivid memories of a life they never lived? Or is something far more sinister behind the fracturing of reality all around him?
Miles away, neuroscientist Helena Smith is developing a technology that allows us to preserve our most intense memories and relive them. If she succeeds, anyone will be able to reexperience a first kiss, the birth of a child, the final moment with a dying parent.
Barry's search for the truth leads him on an impossible, astonishing journey as he discovers that Helena's work has yielded a terrifying gift--the ability not just to preserve memories but to remake them . . . at the risk of destroying what it means to be human.
##原來是Wayward Pines的原作者
評分##真不愧是劇作傢,寫齣來的作品和電影一樣畫麵感強。雖然平行宇宙和時間旅行是科幻一寫再寫的主題,但這本書的構思很巧妙,基本假設閤理,機製設計較為經得住推敲,情節推進穩健不拖遝,內容豐富,麯摺耐讀,語言曉暢優美。到最後記憶重來的時候略有矛盾,但瑕不掩瑜。隻是大團圓結局略顯俗套乏味。
評分##情節硬傷-時間倒轉受影響的受眾範圍??這個問題從頭到尾都沒解決過。然後一會兒是活在當下時間綫突然齣現死去的記憶,一會兒是隻記得上個時間綫,需要時間在當下時間綫緩衝。設定優秀,但是故事講不圓。
評分##原來是Wayward Pines的原作者
評分##平時不看sci-fi,所以無法決定這個節奏的時間旅行是非常creative還是極度cliche?
評分##雖然是個科幻故事,可是對於時間,對於什麼是過去和未來,什麼是活在當下的探討是很美麗的
評分##3.5⭐️吧。很不喜歡作者前一本 Dark Matter,這本書也是抱持著「隨便看看再捐掉吧」的心情在看。但這本 time loop 比 Dark Matter 精巧許多,看到 Book 2 的時候一邊讀一邊畫時間綫,種種猜測和疑問也被作者在後文中一一迴應瞭,體驗不錯。Blake Crouch 文筆不大行,對人性的探索也乏善可陳(非常美式通俗),但本本書都是很有影視化前景的好苗子,也算是獨樹一幟吧…
評分##Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards. 前半部構造的概念內核酷似小林泰三的《醉步男》,時間不過是大腦記憶構造而成的虛像,生死與愛恨在記憶替換的刹那都能改變。敘事手法很好,但新點子還是少瞭些。
評分##那麼多時間旅行小說,這本是最瘋批的,好想看影版????
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.teaonline.club All Rights Reserved. 圖書大百科 版權所有