How will Artificial Intelligence affect crime, war, justice, jobs, society and our very sense of being human? The rise of AI has the potential to transform our future more than any other technology—and there’s nobody better qualified or situated to explore that future than Max Tegmark, an MIT professor who’s helped mainstream research on how to keep AI beneficial.
How can we grow our prosperity through automation without leaving people lacking income or purpose? What career advice should we give today’s kids? How can we make future AI systems more robust, so that they do what we want without crashing, malfunctioning or getting hacked? Should we fear an arms race in lethal autonomous weapons? Will machines eventually outsmart us at all tasks, replacing humans on the job market and perhaps altogether? Will AI help life flourish like never before or give us more power than we can handle?
What sort of future do you want? This book empowers you to join what may be the most important conversation of our time. It doesn’t shy away from the full range of viewpoints or from the most controversial issues—from superintelligence to meaning, consciousness and the ultimate physical limits on life in the cosmos.
##到后面越来越无聊
评分##嗯。无人驾驶会减少90%的车祸率,可毕竟不是全部规避。这样如果发生交通事故,怎么追究责任呢?人们这种外部归因的习惯,是会因为找不到凶手而自己开车呢?还是选择相信90%呢?
评分##The Near Future: Breakthroughs, Bugs, Laws, Weapons and Jobs
评分##嗯。无人驾驶会减少90%的车祸率,可毕竟不是全部规避。这样如果发生交通事故,怎么追究责任呢?人们这种外部归因的习惯,是会因为找不到凶手而自己开车呢?还是选择相信90%呢?
评分##007课大局观下的生命和智能;008课I与AI; 009课AI的文明使命;日课017 /018 令人困扰的:“大目标” ;日课019/020 意识ABC
评分##到后面越来越无聊
评分##嗯。无人驾驶会减少90%的车祸率,可毕竟不是全部规避。这样如果发生交通事故,怎么追究责任呢?人们这种外部归因的习惯,是会因为找不到凶手而自己开车呢?还是选择相信90%呢?
评分##前半部分作者尝试描述未来的人类和AI前景时,内容一直在fiction/假设/纯畅想中来回摇摆,一直到讲回物理把scale拉到宇宙,才感觉论证有依据起来,感觉动辄对人类几百万年后的论证不是没事儿干。本来只想借科学家之眼来一个对near future的glimpse,却收获了一整本严肃的对生命/意识/科技/机器和的探讨,一整章轻松的对Elon Musk的欣赏,和一句人类未来由每个人书写的鼓励!
评分##开头的故事是亮点,。后面就。。。啰里八嗦读不下去了
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.teaonline.club All Rights Reserved. 图书大百科 版权所有