英美法案例精選叢書：英美商事法（第2版）（英文版） [English & American International Commercial Case Law (2nd Edition)] 下載 mobi epub pdf 電子書 2024

☆☆☆☆☆
簡體網頁||繁體網頁



點擊這裡下載

類似圖書 點擊查看全場最低價

---

內容簡介

　　《英美法案例精選叢書：英美商事法（第2版）（英文版）》選自英美法院的國際商事判例。這些判例主要涉及貨物買賣閤同、信用證交易、損害賠償與救濟以及法院對仲裁程序之監督與支持。鑒於這些判例在國際商事領 域很具代錶性，而且其理由分析、文字錶達、邏輯推理等諸多方麵都有參考和藉鑒作用，本人非常樂意選擇這方麵的案例，編輯成書並推薦給從事國際商事法律與仲裁工作的同仁，尤其是選修國際商事法的學生，無論是法律本科生，還是研究生和博士生。

內頁插圖

目錄

第一部分 買賣閤同
案例1 MANATEE V.OCEANBULK
案例2 TRASIMEX V.ADDAX
案例3 MOUSAKA V.GOLDEN SEAGULL
案例4 BRITVIC V.MESSER
案例5 EXXONMOBIL V.TEXACO
案例6 SLATER V.FINNING LTD.
案例7 NORTH SEA V.PETROLEUM AUTHORITY OF THAILAND
案例8 RICHCO V.BUNGE
案例9 BULK V.ZENZIPER
案例10 MAMIDOILJETOIL V.OKTA
案例11 STATE TRADING CORP.V.M.GOLODETZ LTD.
案例12 COMPAGNIE COMMERCIALE SUCRES ET DENREES V.C.CZARNIKOW LTD.
案例13 CORAL （UK） LTD.V.RECHTMAN AND ALTRO MOZART
案例14 CLEGG V.ANDERSSON
案例15 P.T.PUTRABALI ADYAMULIA V.COCIETE EST EPICES
案例16 P&G; V.KURT A.BECHER
案例17 SOON HUA SENG CO.LTD.V.GLENCORE GRAIN LTD.
案例18 RICHCO V.ALFRED C.TOEPFER
案例19 TRUK （U.K.） LTD.V.TOKMAKIDIS
案例20 HUYTON S.A.V.DISTRIBUIDORA INTERNACIONAL DE PRODUCTOS AGRICPLAS
案例21 NORTHERN FOODS PLC V.FOCAL FOODS LTD.
案例22 SCANDINAVIAN TRADING CO.A/B V.ZODIAC PETROLEUM S.A.
案例23 VITOL S.A.V.NORELF LTD.
案例24 ALFRED C.TOEPFER V.CONTINENTAL GRAIN CO.
案例25 GRAINS & FOURRAGES V.HUYTON
案例26 LUK LEAMINGTON LTD V.WHITNASH PLC

第二部分 信用證交易
案例27 MAHONIA LTD.V.JP MORGAN
案例28 SEACONSAR V.BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN
案例29 VOESTALPINE V.BANK OF CHINA
案例30 ALL SERVICE V.BANCO BAMERINDUS DO BRAZIL
案例31 HERITAGE BANK V.REDCOM LABORATORIES
案例32 VOESTALPINE V.BANK OF CHINA

第三部分 損害賠償
案例33 ALWAZIR V.ISLAMIC PRESS AGENCY INC.
案例34 HUYTON V.PETER CREMER
案例35 ETABLISSEMENTS SOULES ET CIE V.INTERTRADEX
案例36 STANDARD CHARTERED BANK V.PAKISTAN NATIONAL SHIPPING CORPORATION
案例37 COASTAL （BERMUDA） PETROLEUM LTD.V.VTT VULCAN PETROLEUM S.A.
案例38 BEM DIS A TURK TICARET S/A TR V.INTERNATIONAL AGRI TRADE CO.LTD
案例39 FYFFES GROUP LTD.V.TEMPLEMAN
案例40 SINOCHEM V.MOBIL
案例41 AGRIMEX V.TRADIGERAIN

第四部分 法院對仲裁程序之監督與支持
案例42 CHINA AGRIBUSINESS V.BALLI
案例43 PETROLEOS DE PORTUGAL V.BP
案例44 AL HADHA V.TRADIGRAIN
案例45 EGMATRA V.MARCO
案例46 WESTLAND V.SHEIKH SALAH
案例47 PETROSHIPS V.PETEC
案例48 HENRY V.MALMASON
案例49 PROFILATI V.PAINEWEBBER
案例50 ATHETIC UNION OF CONSTATINOPLE V.NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION
案例51 AIR INDIA LTD V.CARIBJET INC.
案例52 TOEPFER V.MOLINO BOSHI
附錄

精彩書摘

　　3.In the circumstance it was proper to infer that the goods were shipped within the shipment period and that they were shipped probably on Feb. 10，1984 so that the contractual allowance of 3.5 per cent became payable；beyond that sum nothing was recoverable and the appeal would be allowed and award varied.
　　The buyers appealed.
　　Sellers committed a breach of a condition of the contract in as much as the bills of lading were dated incorrectly and therefore any question of damages being limited to contractual allowances does not arise.
　　The essence of Mr.Russell's argument in favor of the buyers was deceptively simple，although，as the Judge had also pointed out，overlaid by a great deal of unnecessary complexity.His submissions were designed to demonstrate the importance of correctly dated bills of lading in the context of various aspects of c.i.f.contracts and contracts for the carriage of goods by sea No one doubts these matters for one moment， the whole basis of the decision in James Finlay was that one of the sellers' obligations under a c.i.f.contract is to present a correctly dated bill of lading. This obligation has the character of a condition，in the sense that the buyers are entitled to reject a tender of documents which include an incorrectly dated big.of lading，and thus entitled to refuse to pay for the goods. On a falling market it is self-evident that buyers would have availed themselves of this right if they had known that the tendered bill of lading was misdated As Lord Justice Scranton said in James Finlay at pp.249 and 409，the buyers would in that event have kept the price in their pocket And in James Finlay and Kwei Rek Chao the buyers accordingly recovered full damages on this basis. No more need be said by way of introduction.
　　One then comes to the buyers' seductive submission on these lines.Mr.Russell said that it followed that if，the buyers had known in this case that the bill of lading had been undated they would have rejected the documents，refused to pay the price and left the sellers to face the loss resulting from the fall in the market As a statement of what would have happened if the buyers had known the true facts this is obviously true.But it does not provide the correct test in law. The issue is not what the true facts are. The first question is： what would have been the buyers' rights if the sellers had not committed the breach on which the buyers rely？
　　The correct analysis of the issue is not only apparent from the passages cited from the judgments in James Finlay，but also as a matter of general principle.The object of an award of damages for breach of contract is to put the innocent party in the same position so far as money can do it as if the contract had not been broken So put，the answer-to the present problem becomes obvious. If there had been no breach，then the bill of lading under contract 83/703 would have been dated Feb.6 or 10 instead of Jan 31. In that event the buyers would have had no right to reject it or to refuse to pay for the goods. They would only have been entitled to the contractual allowance for shipment in February.In relation to contract 83/701 the position would have been different.A correctly dated bill of lading would have revealed the sellers' breach of condition in relation to the date of s：torment，whereas an incorrect date concealed this breach On that basis，following James Finlay，the buyers were nightly awarded full damages under contract 83/701.But the Board of Appeal was wrong in drawing no distinction in relation to contract 83/703 and awarding full damages in both cases.
　　……

前言/序言

　　近年來，隨著全球經濟一體化進程的加快和我國對外貿易總量的大幅攀升，我國與外國主體間的貿易摩擦和經濟糾紛呈現不斷上升的態勢，與此同時，隨著我國大國地位的日益顯現，在有關國際組織的法律崗位上，我國應當有數量更多、職位更高的代言人。凡此種種，都對培養能夠服務於我國利益的高端國際化法律人纔提齣急迫的需求；與此同時，也會引發這樣的問題：我國的大學在培養此類人纔方麵應當發揮什麼作用？
　　毋庸置疑的是，能夠服務於我國利益的高端國際化法律人纔必須是學貫東西的人纔，必須具有我國國內法律教育的背景，懂得中國國情和精通中國的法律。因此，作為他們成纔的第一步，必須在中國的法律院校接受教育。這就決定瞭，我國的法學院在培養此類人纔方麵是可以有所作為的。
　　接下來的問題是，中國的法律院校應如何在學生接受國內教育的階段，特彆是在大學本科階段，為他們後來成為高端國際化法律人纔，在知識儲備和能力培養方麵奠定良好的基礎？實踐證明，高端國際化法律人纔在其接受教育的過程中，必須在基礎英語、法律專業英語、中國法知識、外國法知識，以及交叉學科知識等多個方麵積纍知識和擴展能力。由此為今後的齣國深造，特彆是在特定的專業法律領域的成功發展，奠定堅實的基礎。
　　因此，對法律專業英語的學習是培養高端國際化法律人纔的重要環節。進一步說，隨著近年來我國法律事務中涉外內容的增加，即使對一般的法律工作人員來說，要勝任日常的工作，通常也需要在相當的程度上具備法律專業英語的能力。
　　本係列教材是很好的適閤於在我國法律院校開展法律專業英語教學的教材。首先，本係列教材是以英美法為內容的教材。目前，英美法不僅在解決國際商事爭端的法律體係中明顯地占據著主導地位，並且WTO爭端解決機製的運作模式也是以英美法為基礎進行設計的。其次，本係列教材是案例教材。采用這套教材，有助於推動案例教學和法律教學改革的開展。最後，本係列教材自2007年齣版以來，已經為一些法律院校采用。實踐證明，這套教材的編寫和使用對於我國國際化法律人纔的培養已經起到瞭一定的作用。其效果之一是，由於這套教材中的案例大都是精選的為美國法學院的教材所采用的經典案例，在國內學習過此套教材的學生，藉助原來學習的基礎，在後來去英美法國傢留學的過程中，往往能駕輕就熟，獲得較好的成績。
　　本係列教材第二版中的各個教材對第一版作瞭不同程度的改進和完善，進一步提高瞭質量。在這一版付梓之際，我謹代錶作者們對使用本教材的各位教師錶示衷心的感謝，並希望在我國的法律院校中，有更多的教師加入我國國際化法律人纔培養的教師行列。

英美法案例精選叢書：英美商事法（第2版）（英文版） [English & American International Commercial Case Law (2nd Edition)] 下載 mobi epub pdf txt 電子書 格式

評分☆☆☆☆☆

評分☆☆☆☆☆

評分☆☆☆☆☆

評分☆☆☆☆☆

評分☆☆☆☆☆

評分☆☆☆☆☆

評分☆☆☆☆☆

評分☆☆☆☆☆

評分☆☆☆☆☆

類似圖書 點擊查看全場最低價