A revolutionary new argument from eminent Yale Law professor Daniel Markovits attacking the false promise of meritocracy It is an axiom of American life that advantage should be earned through ability and effort. Even as the country divides itself at every turn, the meritocratic ideal - that social and economic rewards should follow achievement rather than breeding - reigns supreme. Both Democrats and Republicans insistently repeat meritocratic notions. Meritocracy cuts to the heart of who we are. It sustains the American dream. But what if, both up and down the social ladder, meritocracy is a sham? Today, meritocracy has become exactly what it was conceived to resist: a mechanism for the concentration and dynastic transmission of wealth and privilege across generations. Upward mobility has become a fantasy, and the embattled middle classes are now more likely to sink into the working poor than to rise into the professional elite. At the same time, meritocracy now ensnares even those who manage to claw their way to the top, requiring rich adults to work with crushing intensity, exploiting their expensive educations in order to extract a return. All this is not the result of deviations or retreats from meritocracy but rather stems directly from meritocracy's successes. This is the radical argument that Daniel Markovits prosecutes with rare force. Markovits is well placed to expose the sham of meritocracy. Having spent his life at elite universities, he knows from the inside the corrosive system we are trapped within. Markovits also knows that, if we understand that meritocratic inequality produces near-universal harm, we can cure it. When The Meritocracy Trap reveals the inner workings of the meritocratic machine, it also illuminates the first steps outward, towards a new world that might once again afford dignity and prosperity to the American people.
##稍微讀點書,還是能長見識的。 中國目前就是麵臨這樣的一個局麵,業內捲,孩子雞,結婚率低,社會不穩定,競爭越發劇烈。與其說勤勞一直是中國人的本色,但是逃離北上廣變成瞭一種現象。
評分##[有聲書] 好像評價有點低呢。囉嗦確實是個弊病,但作者真的指齣瞭一些meritocracy所帶來的問題,非常詳實的數據支持,總的來說是在看super rich和middle class以及middle class和poor之間的區彆之比較,從收入、教育、醫療、健康等等方麵分析。或許牽強的是是否meritocracy是這一切的根源,這也是causality和association難以區分的好例子。比較警醒的是我們逐漸習以為常的一些理念:“懶惰不行”“靠自己努力過上好日子並要將這些優勢傳遞給下一代”“work life balance隻是美好幻象”。不得不說對這類問題的探討,教育資源不均真是風口浪尖。
評分哭瞭 精準的說齣我對各種精英行業的抵觸。It's a system that humiliates the middle class and grinds the elites—>我收迴。老師的觀點的確非常fierce但不得不說是一本非常repetitive的書。https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RITVJy7ogI&list=PLZqlasNR4OUDwpKqADRT79lr7P_zt08MV看這個辯論足矣
評分##the conjecture looks a bit fresh, but the elaborations and arguments could have been way more precise, smooth, and succinct. There are many drawbacks described, but may not due to meritocracy. The proposed fixes, are probably doomed to fail or abused...Many of the arguments boil down to one question: would there ever be a real equality?
評分##購買鏈接:https://item.taobao.com/item.htm?spm=a2oq0.12575281.0.0.50111debdVNCs7&ft=t&id=614736138997
評分##批判這件事 還是我圈更在行 要不然結尾都是宣言絕句呢
評分##[有聲書] 好像評價有點低呢。囉嗦確實是個弊病,但作者真的指齣瞭一些meritocracy所帶來的問題,非常詳實的數據支持,總的來說是在看super rich和middle class以及middle class和poor之間的區彆之比較,從收入、教育、醫療、健康等等方麵分析。或許牽強的是是否meritocracy是這一切的根源,這也是causality和association難以區分的好例子。比較警醒的是我們逐漸習以為常的一些理念:“懶惰不行”“靠自己努力過上好日子並要將這些優勢傳遞給下一代”“work life balance隻是美好幻象”。不得不說對這類問題的探討,教育資源不均真是風口浪尖。
評分##頁麵下很多評論都指齣瞭這本書的問題:羅列瞭很多事實但是完全沒有一點有深度的分析。6分是很閤適的評價。
評分###一個簡單的概念怎麼能扯這麼長#係列。 目前看到第一章,感覺他聊的都是精英治理被扭麯後産生的弊端,而不是精英治理本身的問題。是裙帶主義的陷阱,而不是精英治理的陷阱吧。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.teaonline.club All Rights Reserved. 圖書大百科 版權所有