A revolutionary new argument from eminent Yale Law professor Daniel Markovits attacking the false promise of meritocracy It is an axiom of American life that advantage should be earned through ability and effort. Even as the country divides itself at every turn, the meritocratic ideal - that social and economic rewards should follow achievement rather than breeding - reigns supreme. Both Democrats and Republicans insistently repeat meritocratic notions. Meritocracy cuts to the heart of who we are. It sustains the American dream. But what if, both up and down the social ladder, meritocracy is a sham? Today, meritocracy has become exactly what it was conceived to resist: a mechanism for the concentration and dynastic transmission of wealth and privilege across generations. Upward mobility has become a fantasy, and the embattled middle classes are now more likely to sink into the working poor than to rise into the professional elite. At the same time, meritocracy now ensnares even those who manage to claw their way to the top, requiring rich adults to work with crushing intensity, exploiting their expensive educations in order to extract a return. All this is not the result of deviations or retreats from meritocracy but rather stems directly from meritocracy's successes. This is the radical argument that Daniel Markovits prosecutes with rare force. Markovits is well placed to expose the sham of meritocracy. Having spent his life at elite universities, he knows from the inside the corrosive system we are trapped within. Markovits also knows that, if we understand that meritocratic inequality produces near-universal harm, we can cure it. When The Meritocracy Trap reveals the inner workings of the meritocratic machine, it also illuminates the first steps outward, towards a new world that might once again afford dignity and prosperity to the American people.
##没有新的论据。政策建议看p.277上两句话写清楚的就行了。
评分##the conjecture looks a bit fresh, but the elaborations and arguments could have been way more precise, smooth, and succinct. There are many drawbacks described, but may not due to meritocracy. The proposed fixes, are probably doomed to fail or abused...Many of the arguments boil down to one question: would there ever be a real equality?
评分##批评的就是这种自以为“唯才是举”其实根本无视背后更深层不公平因素的评价体系。
评分##阿姨送我的书,她女儿头脑聪慧但体弱多病她很忧心,给我讲一些怪事比某州某校某年掩盖了N个学生自杀。我感觉现在美国高中也这样吧中国教育大省的高中每年都挂几个的。我认识的叔叔当校长受不了不干了。下午抓起来翻了一遍..作者慷慨陈词,类似hypereducated/superelite的大词简直吓死本韭了。他的观察和论据都非常实在-workplace training以前是雇主提供如今成本转嫁给了员工。但我觉得整本书忽视了了一个大的矛盾,即生产力与生产关系的矛盾,人力不值钱,制造合格劳动力的养育成本太高,更不用说医生律师等。养孩假设按照每年20W成本,复利10%20年后总成本1145W;换做15%复利总成本就变成2048W了..啥样的工作能justify这种投入啊?那可不就形成了一个trap..
评分##时不时会有一本书,让我觉得把头脑里一直以来模糊的想法梳理清楚,片段的观念串珠成线,这本书就是这样的。“择优录取”表面看来是如此正确、先进、优良、公平的一个制度,但深挖下去,和很多东西一样,藏着各种黑洞。不,我并不认为我们需要打倒择优这件事——比起很多其他的制度,它依然是远远领先的,但是,意识到一件事情不那么“理所当然”,看到隐藏在褶皱里被人忽视的裂缝,以及这些裂缝里的人,和他们的挣扎,是任何社会、和制度前进的条件。另外一个有醍醐灌顶效果的是书里提到,既得利益阶级和他们的后代,同样是这种制度的受害者,就像剑齿虎夸张的獠牙已经偏离了进化的优势,却成为沉重的负担一样。所以在个人层面上,我在听这本书时想得最多的一句话就是,我不打算成为这个择优游戏的牺牲品,我也不会让我的孩子成为牺牲品。
评分##没有新的论据。政策建议看p.277上两句话写清楚的就行了。
评分##稍微读点书,还是能长见识的。 中国目前就是面临这样的一个局面,业内卷,孩子鸡,结婚率低,社会不稳定,竞争越发剧烈。与其说勤劳一直是中国人的本色,但是逃离北上广变成了一种现象。
评分##the conjecture looks a bit fresh, but the elaborations and arguments could have been way more precise, smooth, and succinct. There are many drawbacks described, but may not due to meritocracy. The proposed fixes, are probably doomed to fail or abused...Many of the arguments boil down to one question: would there ever be a real equality?
评分##对一个发现印象很深:金领为了维持地位而疯狂工作,积累了大量财富却无法享受生活,因此而感到不幸福;中产工作的时间减少收入也减少,有了大量的时间却难以提高社会阶层/经济收入,也不幸福。这个世界啊。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.teaonline.club All Rights Reserved. 图书大百科 版权所有