具體描述
A liberal society seeks not to impose a single way of life, but to leave its citizens as free as possible to choose their own values and ends. It therefore must govern by principles of justice that do not presuppose any particular vision of the good life. But can any such principles be found? And if not, what are the consequences for justice as a moral and political ideal? These are the questions Michael Sandel takes up in this penetrating critique of contemporary liberalism. This new edition includes a new introduction and a new final chapter in which Professor Sandel responds to the later work of John Rawls.
用戶評價
##不到兩百頁的正文濃縮精簡瞭自康德到諾齊剋羅爾斯的deontological theory，加上Sandel自己算得上華麗的文風，使此書讀起來略吃力，但總的來說，關於“self”與道德法則的“順序”問題分析地相當深刻。
評分##從蘇格拉底與柏拉圖開始，正義在言辭城邦中第一次亮相。柏拉圖筆下的蘇格拉底在正義的話題上侃侃而談時，他開始瞭最初的道德宇宙觀。他以正義的原則，建構著理想城邦。但是在這個過程中，he suffered from the limits of justice, especially when he tried to apply justice as the primary principle of the community. The paradoxical relationship between two supposedly opposite sentiments and bonds presented this flaw. 桑德爾間接地處理該問題。作為社會學傢的滕尼斯（雖然其作品時常被指責）…
評分##不到兩百頁的正文濃縮精簡瞭自康德到諾齊剋羅爾斯的deontological theory，加上Sandel自己算得上華麗的文風，使此書讀起來略吃力，但總的來說，關於“self”與道德法則的“順序”問題分析地相當深刻。
評分##大愛桑德爾教授
評分##不到兩百頁的正文濃縮精簡瞭自康德到諾齊剋羅爾斯的deontological theory，加上Sandel自己算得上華麗的文風，使此書讀起來略吃力，但總的來說，關於“self”與道德法則的“順序”問題分析地相當深刻。
評分##從蘇格拉底與柏拉圖開始，正義在言辭城邦中第一次亮相。柏拉圖筆下的蘇格拉底在正義的話題上侃侃而談時，他開始瞭最初的道德宇宙觀。他以正義的原則，建構著理想城邦。但是在這個過程中，he suffered from the limits of justice, especially when he tried to apply justice as the primary principle of the community. The paradoxical relationship between two supposedly opposite sentiments and bonds presented this flaw. 桑德爾間接地處理該問題。作為社會學傢的滕尼斯（雖然其作品時常被指責）…
評分##從蘇格拉底與柏拉圖開始，正義在言辭城邦中第一次亮相。柏拉圖筆下的蘇格拉底在正義的話題上侃侃而談時，他開始瞭最初的道德宇宙觀。他以正義的原則，建構著理想城邦。但是在這個過程中，he suffered from the limits of justice, especially when he tried to apply justice as the primary principle of the community. The paradoxical relationship between two supposedly opposite sentiments and bonds presented this flaw. 桑德爾間接地處理該問題。作為社會學傢的滕尼斯（雖然其作品時常被指責）…
評分##接著昨天說的，這本真的是把正義論拆開揉碎地分析，Sandel還是有他的洞見的。（btw他當年在哈佛還是耶魯的政治哲學公開課真的不錯）但到頭來我覺得在理論層麵上，Rawls一個political citizen的概念就能把Sandel依賴的直覺拆掉十之八九。Rawls的問題在liberalism的實踐，但我覺得Sandel在實踐層麵上可能問題更大...
評分##An Eye-opening reading experience.
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.teaonline.club All Rights Reserved. 圖書大百科 版權所有