The human brain has some capabilities that the brains of other animals lack. It is to these distinctive capabilities that our species owes its dominant position. Other animals have stronger muscles or sharper claws, but we have cleverer brains.If machine brains one day come to surpass human brains in general intelligence, then this new superintelligence could become very powerful. As the fate of the gorillas now depends more on us humans than on the gorillas themselves, so the fate of our species then would come to depend on the actions of the machine superintelligence.But we have one advantage: we get to make the first move. Will it be possible to construct a seed AI or otherwise to engineer initial conditions so as to make an intelligence explosion survivable? How could one achieve a controlled detonation?To get closer to an answer to this question, we must make our way through a fascinating landscape of topics and considerations. Read the book and learn about oracles, genies, singletons; about boxing methods, tripwires, and mind crime; about humanitys cosmic endowment and differential technological development; indirect normativity, instrumental convergence, whole brain emulation and technology couplings; Malthusian economics and dystopian evolution; artificial intelligence, and biologicalcognitive enhancement, and collective intelligence.This profoundly ambitious and original book picks its way carefully through a vast tract of forbiddingly difficult intellectual terrain. Yet the writing is so lucid that it somehow makes it all seem easy. After an utterly engrossing journey that takes us to the frontiers of thinking about the human condition and the future of intelligent life, we find in Nick Bostroms work nothing less than a reconceptualization of the essential task of our time.
##Too boring... Someone can definitely write a book with counter arguments. And AI is just like nuclear technologies: men should be more careful with ourselves, not the technologies.
評分##韆萬彆上當。一句話能說明白的事逼逼一本書。不知道是不是哪個矽榖大佬朋友寫的。這麼力薦這本書
評分另一本腦洞大開的書。探討瞭人工智能的不同形式,其可能帶來的風險,以及人類可能采取的應對方式。
評分##AI的哲學思考,第一遍啃下來部分沒懂,看懂的部分覺得很有道理。有空再來啃一遍。
評分##Too boring... Someone can definitely write a book with counter arguments. And AI is just like nuclear technologies: men should be more careful with ourselves, not the technologies.
評分##想到有一個唯一目標是算pi值的超級智能,在人類滅絕一百萬年以後,窮盡瞭地球以緻全部星係資源,還在孜孜不倦地計算pi值,就有點兒好笑呢
評分##就是喜歡開腦洞和關於未來的書。不知道會不會在有生之年等來這一刻。
評分##3.5
評分##Blinkist掃過。速讀中沒有感到什麼哲學成分,討論的內容和框架也缺乏新意,提倡全球閤作有序推進集體監管。多次技術阻礙都是需要儲存上信息量太大和運算量太大。兩種發展模式:模仿人的思維邏輯和復製人腦結構/功能。人類的核心價值觀到底能不能被學習?作者感覺對於由於機器的過度發達以及對於目的高效執行力,以及落入壞人手裏後,都有導緻人類毀滅的危險。咋就不怕川普一衝動就按核按鈕呢?
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.teaonline.club All Rights Reserved. 圖書大百科 版權所有