An international and historical look at how parenting choices change in the face of economic inequality
Parents everywhere want their children to be happy and do well. Yet how parents seek to achieve this ambition varies enormously. For instance, American and Chinese parents are increasingly authoritative and authoritarian, whereas Scandinavian parents tend to be more permissive. Why? Love, Money, and Parenting investigates how economic forces and growing inequality shape how parents raise their children. From medieval times to the present, and from the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Sweden to China and Japan, Matthias Doepke and Fabrizio Zilibotti look at how economic incentives and constraints--such as money, knowledge, and time--influence parenting practices and what is considered good parenting in different countries.
Through personal anecdotes and original research, Doepke and Zilibotti show that in countries with increasing economic inequality, such as the United States, parents push harder to ensure their children have a path to security and success. Economics has transformed the hands-off parenting of the 1960s and '70s into a frantic, overscheduled activity. Growing inequality has also resulted in an increasing "parenting gap" between richer and poorer families, raising the disturbing prospect of diminished social mobility and fewer opportunities for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. In nations with less economic inequality, such as Sweden, the stakes are less high, and social mobility is not under threat. Doepke and Zilibotti discuss how investments in early childhood development and the design of education systems factor into the parenting equation, and how economics can help shape policies that will contribute to the ideal of equal opportunity for all.
Love, Money, and Parenting presents an engrossing look at the economics of the family in the modern world.
##刚读到第一章,特别有启发。推荐所有准备当父母,已经当父母和当过父母的人。这本书同时也加深了我对现在社会中不平等现象的忧虑。读完后再给大家报告。谢谢
评分##非常enlightening , 用经济学角度从纵向(历史)和横向(各国)两个维度分析养育方式背后的经济动力。也有涉及性别,宗教,文化等影响因素。近些年流行向别国养娃,教育方式取经,法国妈妈育儿,芬兰教育等等都很流行,但某国在某个时期的育儿主流方式是从其社会政治文化土壤中长出来的,无法平移,甚至不能简单说更好。只有当孩子,家长,社会的发展方向都往一个方向,才会不拧巴,比如芬兰。而很多国家家长的选择在社会和孩子之间拉扯,既要以当下社会为参照系谋求孩子过上好日子, 也想顺应孩子的自然发展,这就很拉扯了。最后,中美在养育方式和很多社会特征上,相似远大过差异,别闹了真是。
评分##inequality --> helicopter parents
评分##经济学的视角梳理了育儿观念,生育意愿的历史变迁。这些看似主观的决定,也脱不了所处的时代背景。也不免让人好奇:作为个体,是顺应时代的大多数还是依从自己意愿对子女更好呢?
评分##喜欢这本书。经济学家的背景婉婉道来美国,欧洲(北欧,西班牙,法国,意大利)和东亚(日本,中国)不同的社会环境造成了不同的父母(专制型,说教型和随波逐流型)。里面还有大量的数据实证分析。准备买一本收藏之。
评分##不管什么教育模式,都是历史、文化、社会、经济环境和政府政策共同影响的产物,所以也就没有非此即彼,也没有对错可言,只是应用程度的问题。个人觉得要想实行完全放任自由的教育理念,至少得有资金获取最好的教育资源,能提供一个良好的环境,才能完全放任小孩自我习得和成长。(第一次完整听完一本audiobook,发现听书还挺有效率的呀~)
评分##喜欢这本书。经济学家的背景婉婉道来美国,欧洲(北欧,西班牙,法国,意大利)和东亚(日本,中国)不同的社会环境造成了不同的父母(专制型,说教型和随波逐流型)。里面还有大量的数据实证分析。准备买一本收藏之。
评分##经济、政策、历史、宗教、父母受教育程度、阶级流动难易、教育投资回报率…不同程度地影响父母在专断、权威、放任型教育中抉择。中国虎妈密集型教育(较高的投资回报率,良好的教育很大程度上保障了名牌学校好的工作);荷兰的儿童拥有最幸福的童年(12岁前考试竞争压力)得益于教育资源均衡;瑞士等发达国家对于小孩的教养更放任些;但芬兰放任型的教育理念并不影响孩子在PISA中获得较好的成绩,他们更看重小孩的创造性;大多数东亚国家父母传递勤奋(尤其中国90%),独立的价值(欧洲国家也是);阶级对下一代的教育传递出截然不同的价值观,中产阶级传递职业道德和勤奋,上层/贵族传递优雅从容,花更多的时间和金钱培养学习高雅的兴趣,积极参与上流的社交,锁定阶层特权。(一组数据挺震惊的河南考生清华录取率是北京的1/300????)
评分##Solid research
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.teaonline.club All Rights Reserved. 图书大百科 版权所有