An international and historical look at how parenting choices change in the face of economic inequality
Parents everywhere want their children to be happy and do well. Yet how parents seek to achieve this ambition varies enormously. For instance, American and Chinese parents are increasingly authoritative and authoritarian, whereas Scandinavian parents tend to be more permissive. Why? Love, Money, and Parenting investigates how economic forces and growing inequality shape how parents raise their children. From medieval times to the present, and from the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Sweden to China and Japan, Matthias Doepke and Fabrizio Zilibotti look at how economic incentives and constraints--such as money, knowledge, and time--influence parenting practices and what is considered good parenting in different countries.
Through personal anecdotes and original research, Doepke and Zilibotti show that in countries with increasing economic inequality, such as the United States, parents push harder to ensure their children have a path to security and success. Economics has transformed the hands-off parenting of the 1960s and '70s into a frantic, overscheduled activity. Growing inequality has also resulted in an increasing "parenting gap" between richer and poorer families, raising the disturbing prospect of diminished social mobility and fewer opportunities for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. In nations with less economic inequality, such as Sweden, the stakes are less high, and social mobility is not under threat. Doepke and Zilibotti discuss how investments in early childhood development and the design of education systems factor into the parenting equation, and how economics can help shape policies that will contribute to the ideal of equal opportunity for all.
Love, Money, and Parenting presents an engrossing look at the economics of the family in the modern world.
##非常enlightening , 用经济学角度从纵向(历史)和横向(各国)两个维度分析养育方式背后的经济动力。也有涉及性别,宗教,文化等影响因素。近些年流行向别国养娃,教育方式取经,法国妈妈育儿,芬兰教育等等都很流行,但某国在某个时期的育儿主流方式是从其社会政治文化土壤中长出来的,无法平移,甚至不能简单说更好。只有当孩子,家长,社会的发展方向都往一个方向,才会不拧巴,比如芬兰。而很多国家家长的选择在社会和孩子之间拉扯,既要以当下社会为参照系谋求孩子过上好日子, 也想顺应孩子的自然发展,这就很拉扯了。最后,中美在养育方式和很多社会特征上,相似远大过差异,别闹了真是。
评分##喜欢这本书。经济学家的背景婉婉道来美国,欧洲(北欧,西班牙,法国,意大利)和东亚(日本,中国)不同的社会环境造成了不同的父母(专制型,说教型和随波逐流型)。里面还有大量的数据实证分析。准备买一本收藏之。
评分随便看看吧。主要就是说,由于各国的经济政策这些年的变化,以及贫富差距加大,世界范围内,家长管的都越来越加强孩子的教育。intensive和permissive parenting各有利弊,每家对hardworking,independence,creativity的看重程度不同而已哈。 看完后个人认为既然孩子在中国,还是萝卜加大棒都要有,模仿瑞典芬兰的permissive parenting不具备人家的社会背景,tiger mom式教育挺符合我国国情的。
评分##刚读到第一章,特别有启发。推荐所有准备当父母,已经当父母和当过父母的人。这本书同时也加深了我对现在社会中不平等现象的忧虑。读完后再给大家报告。谢谢
评分##资本逻辑下分析的各国育娃状况细致有理,但分析终究是提出问题,这样的教育不平等的矛盾状况却似乎是没有解法
评分##经济学的视角梳理了育儿观念,生育意愿的历史变迁。这些看似主观的决定,也脱不了所处的时代背景。也不免让人好奇:作为个体,是顺应时代的大多数还是依从自己意愿对子女更好呢?
评分##inequality --> helicopter parents
评分##It's not a book about how to parent but a book analyzing the economic conditions where different parenting methods arise. I went into the book expecting it to be an academic read so didn't have any problem with its story-telling style. I did wish the author could somehow make the book short because most of their arguments were obvious to many.
评分##inequality --> helicopter parents
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.teaonline.club All Rights Reserved. 图书大百科 版权所有