An international and historical look at how parenting choices change in the face of economic inequality
Parents everywhere want their children to be happy and do well. Yet how parents seek to achieve this ambition varies enormously. For instance, American and Chinese parents are increasingly authoritative and authoritarian, whereas Scandinavian parents tend to be more permissive. Why? Love, Money, and Parenting investigates how economic forces and growing inequality shape how parents raise their children. From medieval times to the present, and from the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Sweden to China and Japan, Matthias Doepke and Fabrizio Zilibotti look at how economic incentives and constraints--such as money, knowledge, and time--influence parenting practices and what is considered good parenting in different countries.
Through personal anecdotes and original research, Doepke and Zilibotti show that in countries with increasing economic inequality, such as the United States, parents push harder to ensure their children have a path to security and success. Economics has transformed the hands-off parenting of the 1960s and '70s into a frantic, overscheduled activity. Growing inequality has also resulted in an increasing "parenting gap" between richer and poorer families, raising the disturbing prospect of diminished social mobility and fewer opportunities for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. In nations with less economic inequality, such as Sweden, the stakes are less high, and social mobility is not under threat. Doepke and Zilibotti discuss how investments in early childhood development and the design of education systems factor into the parenting equation, and how economics can help shape policies that will contribute to the ideal of equal opportunity for all.
Love, Money, and Parenting presents an engrossing look at the economics of the family in the modern world.
##Solid research
評分##Solid research
評分##經濟學的視角梳理瞭育兒觀念,生育意願的曆史變遷。這些看似主觀的決定,也脫不瞭所處的時代背景。也不免讓人好奇:作為個體,是順應時代的大多數還是依從自己意願對子女更好呢?
評分##經濟學的視角梳理瞭育兒觀念,生育意願的曆史變遷。這些看似主觀的決定,也脫不瞭所處的時代背景。也不免讓人好奇:作為個體,是順應時代的大多數還是依從自己意願對子女更好呢?
評分##喜歡這本書。經濟學傢的背景婉婉道來美國,歐洲(北歐,西班牙,法國,意大利)和東亞(日本,中國)不同的社會環境造成瞭不同的父母(專製型,說教型和隨波逐流型)。裏麵還有大量的數據實證分析。準備買一本收藏之。
評分##It's not a book about how to parent but a book analyzing the economic conditions where different parenting methods arise. I went into the book expecting it to be an academic read so didn't have any problem with its story-telling style. I did wish the author could somehow make the book short because most of their arguments were obvious to many.
評分##非常enlightening , 用經濟學角度從縱嚮(曆史)和橫嚮(各國)兩個維度分析養育方式背後的經濟動力。也有涉及性彆,宗教,文化等影響因素。近些年流行嚮彆國養娃,教育方式取經,法國媽媽育兒,芬蘭教育等等都很流行,但某國在某個時期的育兒主流方式是從其社會政治文化土壤中長齣來的,無法平移,甚至不能簡單說更好。隻有當孩子,傢長,社會的發展方嚮都往一個方嚮,纔會不擰巴,比如芬蘭。而很多國傢傢長的選擇在社會和孩子之間拉扯,既要以當下社會為參照係謀求孩子過上好日子, 也想順應孩子的自然發展,這就很拉扯瞭。最後,中美在養育方式和很多社會特徵上,相似遠大過差異,彆鬧瞭真是。
評分##喜歡這本書。經濟學傢的背景婉婉道來美國,歐洲(北歐,西班牙,法國,意大利)和東亞(日本,中國)不同的社會環境造成瞭不同的父母(專製型,說教型和隨波逐流型)。裏麵還有大量的數據實證分析。準備買一本收藏之。
評分##Solid research
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.teaonline.club All Rights Reserved. 圖書大百科 版權所有