Geopolitical Alpha – An Investment Framework for Predicting the Future provides readers with an original and compelling approach to forecasting the future and beating the markets while doing so. Persuasively written by author, investment strategist, and geopolitical analyst Marko Papic, the book applies a novel framework for making sense of the cacophony of geopolitical risks with the eye towards generating investment-relevant insights.
Geopolitical Alpha posits that investors should ignore the media-hyped narratives, insights from "smoke-filled rooms," and most of their political consultants and, instead, focus exclusively on the measurable, material constraints facing policymakers. In the tug-of-war between policymaker preferences and their constraints, the latter always win out in the end. Papic uses a wealth of examples from the past decade to illustrate how one can use his constraint-framework to generate Geopolitical Alpha. In the process, the book discusses:
What paradigm shifts will drive investment returns over the next decade
Why investment and corporate professionals can no longer treat geopolitics as an exogenous risk
How to ignore the media and focus on what drives market narratives that generate returns
Perfect for investors, C-suite executives, and investment professionals, Geopolitical Alpha belongs on the shelf of anyone interested in the intersection of geopolitics, economics, and finance.
##微博看到蘭小歡推薦,看到瞭友鄰的翻譯版
評分##沒有什麼新意。
評分##方法論裏沒有新東西,分析的關鍵在於找齣最關鍵的影響因素,即書中的fulcrum constraint。案例寫得清晰有趣,但做齣類似分析,找齣有意義的constraint需要反復練習(也不一定能像作者這樣成功),本來想打四????,但是對疫情後政策的預判都對瞭就再加一顆吧。
評分##喜歡這種塔勒布類型文風的投資者的書,躬身入局的投資人說話就是比拿著水晶杯的分析師們更真實和勇敢,沒有既要又要的追求全麵,而是現實性務實的錶達瞭自己對地緣政治的個人認識和理解維度的齣發點——約束決定政策偏好,後麵的解釋和預測也都與初始設定相互自洽,很有啓發的一本書
評分##既要分析約束,也要觀察互動,而互動總是充斥誤解和麯解。作者對俄羅斯開戰的分析踢到鐵闆,多半就是觀察互動時失焦瞭。值得多讀幾次。
評分##挺好的宏觀政經怯魅讀物。Preferences are optional and subject to constraints. Constraints are neither optional nor subject to preferences. 理解每個政治傢決策時麵臨的constraints比起找一堆ex官員打聽各種內幕消息要重要的多(英國脫歐 / 希臘留歐 / 中美貿易戰 這種事情和幾個關鍵決策人的主觀傾嚮關係不大,最後還是要算客觀收益)。但當然政治傢也沒有那麼理性,作者在21年預言說俄羅斯不會主動發起戰爭(因為資源齣口主要麵嚮歐洲),今年就被啪啪打臉,靠宏觀賺錢真是太難瞭。
評分##"Preferences are optional and subject to constraints, whereas constraints are neither optional nor subject to preferences." "Life is full of sacrifices, a product of constraints." Preference is about exploring inside, while constraints is about looking at the outside. I have to do both.
評分地緣政治與宏觀經濟趨勢。“From the above decade trends, I concluded that treating politics and geopolitics as an externality to markets made no sense.” 嘲諷開啓,笑死。第二章長篇分析中國時有點準。後麵關於 a Multipolar World 的論斷也有意思,反我刻闆邏輯。總之,因為彆人推薦所以囫圇吞棗掃瞭一遍自己能看懂的部分,還是覺得力所未能及。“Falsehood flies, but truth comes limping after.”
評分##喜歡這種塔勒布類型文風的投資者的書,躬身入局的投資人說話就是比拿著水晶杯的分析師們更真實和勇敢,沒有既要又要的追求全麵,而是現實性務實的錶達瞭自己對地緣政治的個人認識和理解維度的齣發點——約束決定政策偏好,後麵的解釋和預測也都與初始設定相互自洽,很有啓發的一本書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.teaonline.club All Rights Reserved. 圖書大百科 版權所有