The New York Times bestselling author of The Origins of Political Order offers a provocative examination of modern identity politics: its origins, its effects, and what it means for domestic and international affairs of state
In 2014, Francis Fukuyama wrote that American institutions were in decay, as the state was progressively captured by powerful interest groups. Two years later, his predictions were borne out by the rise to power of a series of political outsiders whose economic nationalism and authoritarian tendencies threatened to destabilize the entire international order. These populist nationalists seek direct charismatic connection to “the people,” who are usually defined in narrow identity terms that offer an irresistible call to an in-group and exclude large parts of the population as a whole.
Demand for recognition of one’s identity is a master concept that unifies much of what is going on in world politics today. The universal recognition on which liberal democracy is based has been increasingly challenged by narrower forms of recognition based on nation, religion, sect, race, ethnicity, or gender, which have resulted in anti-immigrant populism, the upsurge of politicized Islam, the fractious “identity liberalism” of college campuses, and the emergence of white nationalism. Populist nationalism, said to be rooted in economic motivation, actually springs from the demand for recognition and therefore cannot simply be satisfied by economic means. The demand for identity cannot be transcended; we must begin to shape identity in a way that supports rather than undermines democracy.
Identity is an urgent and necessary book―a sharp warning that unless we forge a universal understanding of human dignity, we will doom ourselves to continuing conflict.
##A good introductory read on identity politics. “the demand for dignity and the politics of resentment”
评分##虽然作者一直在强调identify 和 recognition的重要性和独立性,但是还是隐隐的感觉全球化带来的财富分化和欧洲的经济停滞才是identity politics 发生的根本原因。但是确实正如作者讲得,身份政治具有经济根源,但是一旦被激活其本身就像堡垒一样变得非常坚固,人们脑子里筑起的墙很难再被推倒。 但是作者的药方还是有点苍白啊......
评分##只能算是他想要搞清的问题的第一章。追溯身份的政治哲学起源,最终联系起个人与政治的关系,而当代民主制度也由此诞生。但人们其实没有在尊严上达成共识。因为它寄托于道德实践中,也就成了它既是表象又是问题根源的复杂性,而背后施加影响的是社会。上升到国家层面之后,他在认可其必要星的同时揭示了时代背景下身份政治产生的四个问题。我想身份政治其实是不幸沦为贫富分化的一个cry baby了,吸引了过多的注意力。所以福山表扬了奥巴马医保,可惜医保又遭遇身份政治的反噬。如何改善?他提出要构建新的国家身份,不以狭义个体的自然属性或宗教方向来界定的(听起来也挺危险,理论搞不好就会像他说的赫尔曼和他的老师亨廷顿了)。他的一份药方是公共教育。PS,我爱他提及了神话和科幻作品,我在想美学教育是不是药方里的一味成分?
评分##Fukuyama的厚颜无耻简直令人震惊
评分##一度在好像有点道理和皱眉之间横跳,更多的时候就纯粹是一种索然无味 也许是政治学的stroke对读惯了更nuanced的人类学的taste来说有点太粗了 言必从gj,可行性层面谈论问题,感觉在听西方zf内部辩论 读完这个想去读点graeber缓缓,可行不一定可行,但it feels right. ---------------(分割线) 看完reversing roe滚回来加星????♀️ 残酷的世道面前有什么理想主义可言 dystopia里面讨论什么utopia 每个人都能有块遮羞布地活下去就不错了
评分##为探讨身份政治(Identity Politics),福山梳理从柏拉图 、卢梭、康德、黑格尔、尼采等(思想史),梳理西方社会的历史沿袭(社会史)。福山对identity做了灵魂-心理分析和政治学双重意义上阐释性定义,身份政治是黑格尔意义上人类历史驱动的产物,在西方完成民主化之后因为贫富分化、移民、难民等问题产生的新社会运动。身份政治有两个层面,一者是个体层面为获得尊严(dignity)而争取外部社会对其真实自我的认同,反对社会压制,一者是群体层面(如民族、同性恋、性少数)为获得群体性承认的运动。除了学理分析,福山对2010s的全球政治保持高度关注,其个人视野的政治描述和分析,能够帮助分析当下的国际社会新状况,在书末开出的“药方”(针对中国、欧盟等)可做进一步探讨
评分##虽然作者一直在强调identify 和 recognition的重要性和独立性,但是还是隐隐的感觉全球化带来的财富分化和欧洲的经济停滞才是identity politics 发生的根本原因。但是确实正如作者讲得,身份政治具有经济根源,但是一旦被激活其本身就像堡垒一样变得非常坚固,人们脑子里筑起的墙很难再被推倒。 但是作者的药方还是有点苍白啊......
评分##前四分之三很精彩,把哲学、社会学、心理学等等统一到了Identity的框架下来解释历史如何一步步走到当下。最后提出解决方案的时候却有点力不从心,顶层设计的理想大过社会现实与人性弱点。全球化和互联网是人类从未面对过的挑战,只能hope for the best, prepare for the worst了。
评分##用这个逻辑是不是也能justify,democracy是某锅中产或受高等教育liberal寻求thymos的工具,过度挑战nationalism话语对底层群众不利?
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.teaonline.club All Rights Reserved. 图书大百科 版权所有