The New York Times bestselling author of The Origins of Political Order offers a provocative examination of modern identity politics: its origins, its effects, and what it means for domestic and international affairs of state
In 2014, Francis Fukuyama wrote that American institutions were in decay, as the state was progressively captured by powerful interest groups. Two years later, his predictions were borne out by the rise to power of a series of political outsiders whose economic nationalism and authoritarian tendencies threatened to destabilize the entire international order. These populist nationalists seek direct charismatic connection to “the people,” who are usually defined in narrow identity terms that offer an irresistible call to an in-group and exclude large parts of the population as a whole.
Demand for recognition of one’s identity is a master concept that unifies much of what is going on in world politics today. The universal recognition on which liberal democracy is based has been increasingly challenged by narrower forms of recognition based on nation, religion, sect, race, ethnicity, or gender, which have resulted in anti-immigrant populism, the upsurge of politicized Islam, the fractious “identity liberalism” of college campuses, and the emergence of white nationalism. Populist nationalism, said to be rooted in economic motivation, actually springs from the demand for recognition and therefore cannot simply be satisfied by economic means. The demand for identity cannot be transcended; we must begin to shape identity in a way that supports rather than undermines democracy.
Identity is an urgent and necessary book―a sharp warning that unless we forge a universal understanding of human dignity, we will doom ourselves to continuing conflict.
##號召大傢捍衛自由民主核心價值觀,剋服身份政治的分裂破壞性影響....一顆拳拳愛國之心啊....和馬剋裏拉的思路很像。很喜歡福山的流暢文筆,希望明天有機會要到簽名...
評分##一度在好像有點道理和皺眉之間橫跳,更多的時候就純粹是一種索然無味 也許是政治學的stroke對讀慣瞭更nuanced的人類學的taste來說有點太粗瞭 言必從gj,可行性層麵談論問題,感覺在聽西方zf內部辯論 讀完這個想去讀點graeber緩緩,可行不一定可行,但it feels right. ---------------(分割綫) 看完reversing roe滾迴來加星????♀️ 殘酷的世道麵前有什麼理想主義可言 dystopia裏麵討論什麼utopia 每個人都能有塊遮羞布地活下去就不錯瞭
評分##用“身份政治”來解釋HK廢青暴動,倒是很貼切。
評分##用這個邏輯是不是也能justify,democracy是某鍋中産或受高等教育liberal尋求thymos的工具,過度挑戰nationalism話語對底層群眾不利?
評分##一度在好像有點道理和皺眉之間橫跳,更多的時候就純粹是一種索然無味 也許是政治學的stroke對讀慣瞭更nuanced的人類學的taste來說有點太粗瞭 言必從gj,可行性層麵談論問題,感覺在聽西方zf內部辯論 讀完這個想去讀點graeber緩緩,可行不一定可行,但it feels right. ---------------(分割綫) 看完reversing roe滾迴來加星????♀️ 殘酷的世道麵前有什麼理想主義可言 dystopia裏麵討論什麼utopia 每個人都能有塊遮羞布地活下去就不錯瞭
評分##居然中信沒搶著中譯本,著實驚訝。
評分##雖然作者一直在強調identify 和 recognition的重要性和獨立性,但是還是隱隱的感覺全球化帶來的財富分化和歐洲的經濟停滯纔是identity politics 發生的根本原因。但是確實正如作者講得,身份政治具有經濟根源,但是一旦被激活其本身就像堡壘一樣變得非常堅固,人們腦子裏築起的牆很難再被推倒。 但是作者的藥方還是有點蒼白啊......
評分##A good introductory read on identity politics. “the demand for dignity and the politics of resentment”
評分##居然中信沒搶著中譯本,著實驚訝。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.teaonline.club All Rights Reserved. 圖書大百科 版權所有