The New York Times bestselling author of The Origins of Political Order offers a provocative examination of modern identity politics: its origins, its effects, and what it means for domestic and international affairs of state
In 2014, Francis Fukuyama wrote that American institutions were in decay, as the state was progressively captured by powerful interest groups. Two years later, his predictions were borne out by the rise to power of a series of political outsiders whose economic nationalism and authoritarian tendencies threatened to destabilize the entire international order. These populist nationalists seek direct charismatic connection to “the people,” who are usually defined in narrow identity terms that offer an irresistible call to an in-group and exclude large parts of the population as a whole.
Demand for recognition of one’s identity is a master concept that unifies much of what is going on in world politics today. The universal recognition on which liberal democracy is based has been increasingly challenged by narrower forms of recognition based on nation, religion, sect, race, ethnicity, or gender, which have resulted in anti-immigrant populism, the upsurge of politicized Islam, the fractious “identity liberalism” of college campuses, and the emergence of white nationalism. Populist nationalism, said to be rooted in economic motivation, actually springs from the demand for recognition and therefore cannot simply be satisfied by economic means. The demand for identity cannot be transcended; we must begin to shape identity in a way that supports rather than undermines democracy.
Identity is an urgent and necessary book―a sharp warning that unless we forge a universal understanding of human dignity, we will doom ourselves to continuing conflict.
##花一天時間讀完瞭福山的新書。應該說還是寫得不錯的,繼續瞭他一貫明白曉暢的風格。不過,福山似乎迴避瞭自由主義與身份政治的內在聯係,而將後者歸因於一些政治策略或社會狀況。他對民主的反思也可以再深入一些。這是我在豆瓣上標注讀過的第五百本書,豆瓣成員也算一種身份和認同吧。
評分##一度在好像有點道理和皺眉之間橫跳,更多的時候就純粹是一種索然無味 也許是政治學的stroke對讀慣瞭更nuanced的人類學的taste來說有點太粗瞭 言必從gj,可行性層麵談論問題,感覺在聽西方zf內部辯論 讀完這個想去讀點graeber緩緩,可行不一定可行,但it feels right. ---------------(分割綫) 看完reversing roe滾迴來加星????♀️ 殘酷的世道麵前有什麼理想主義可言 dystopia裏麵討論什麼utopia 每個人都能有塊遮羞布地活下去就不錯瞭
評分##能用階級矛盾解釋的問題 披上身份的外皮
評分##當今左派的問題是從多元滑嚮相對,從而使得身份政治更加碎片化,喪失溝通、團結右翼底層的能力;右翼的問題是民粹化嚴重,民族(幾乎是白人種族主義)和宗教被政治野心傢利用,使得共和黨被茶黨填塞,建製派幾乎喪失議政能力。加之社交網絡加劇的撕裂,維係民主政治穩定性的中左、中右勢力幾乎被摧毀。福山在最後試圖提齣以普世價值的信條來重塑天然、偶在的“身份”,並在民族身份上著墨甚多,想通過同化移民來解決民族身份認同的問題,甚至在歐盟和美國提齣瞭一些具體的移民政策。這種倡議或許隻是超國傢層麵的一廂情願,但對於如何係統性地解決一國內國的問題,如美國的右翼民粹承受的經濟、社會、文化的整體性失落,福山的迴應潦草而簡略“緩解其對工作、收入、安全的擔憂”,但正如他所承認的那樣,右翼民粹的身份認同並不完全是經濟驅動的。
評分##End of self-esteem = birth of government. ???? #論節操的自治
評分##居然中信沒搶著中譯本,著實驚訝。
評分##很值得一看
評分##居然中信沒搶著中譯本,著實驚訝。
評分##為探討身份政治(Identity Politics),福山梳理從柏拉圖 、盧梭、康德、黑格爾、尼采等(思想史),梳理西方社會的曆史沿襲(社會史)。福山對identity做瞭靈魂-心理分析和政治學雙重意義上闡釋性定義,身份政治是黑格爾意義上人類曆史驅動的産物,在西方完成民主化之後因為貧富分化、移民、難民等問題産生的新社會運動。身份政治有兩個層麵,一者是個體層麵為獲得尊嚴(dignity)而爭取外部社會對其真實自我的認同,反對社會壓製,一者是群體層麵(如民族、同性戀、性少數)為獲得群體性承認的運動。除瞭學理分析,福山對2010s的全球政治保持高度關注,其個人視野的政治描述和分析,能夠幫助分析當下的國際社會新狀況,在書末開齣的“藥方”(針對中國、歐盟等)可做進一步探討
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.teaonline.club All Rights Reserved. 圖書大百科 版權所有