具體描述
From bestselling writer David Graeber, a powerful argument against the rise of meaningless, unfulfilling jobs, and their consequences.
Does your job make a meaningful contribution to the world? In the spring of 2013, David Graeber asked this question in a playful, provocative essay titled “On the Phenomenon of Bullshit Jobs.” It went viral. After a million online views in seventeen different languages, people all over the world are still debating the answer.
There are millions of people—HR consultants, communication coordinators, telemarketing researchers, corporate lawyers—whose jobs are useless, and, tragically, they know it. These people are caught in bullshit jobs.
Graeber explores one of society’s most vexing and deeply felt concerns, indicting among other villains a particular strain of finance capitalism that betrays ideals shared by thinkers ranging from Keynes to Lincoln. Bullshit Jobs gives individuals, corporations, and societies permission to undergo a shift in values, placing creative and caring work at the center of our culture. This book is for everyone who wants to turn their vocation back into an avocation.
用戶評價
##作者這本書in itself 生動詮釋瞭什麼叫bullshit job. 建議改行搬磚。
評分看評分，這大概是左派人類學著作被當成popular psychology快餐書推銷給瞭商科學生吧。
評分##David Graeber把我說不齣的痛苦寫瞭齣來。但論文的長度夠瞭，寫成書有點拖遝。
評分##作者這本書in itself 生動詮釋瞭什麼叫bullshit job. 建議改行搬磚。
評分##作者這本書in itself 生動詮釋瞭什麼叫bullshit job. 建議改行搬磚。
評分##這種書真的水分太多瞭，就像短評說的，一篇文章能搞定的事硬生生注水成一本書，還是三百多頁的書。耶魯和LSE的教授就這個水平嗎？
評分##對“無價值工作”的界定有一些待商榷的地方，但隻說作者發現並指齣這一現象，又將其歸結為“資本主義在異化和控製人”的觀點，還是很有價值的。可惜的是，這些觀點本身沒有足夠強有力的分析或論據作為支持。另外我個人覺得，缺乏對“財富分配模式如何形成”的討論和批判，也使得整本書的論證框架有些破碎。適閤拿來打發打發時間（攤手
評分看評分，這大概是左派人類學著作被當成popular psychology快餐書推銷給瞭商科學生吧。
評分##This should be written into a 2 minute joke in a stand-up show in stead of a fucking book
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.teaonline.club All Rights Reserved. 圖書大百科 版權所有