具體描述
n finite games, like football or chess, the players are known, the rules are fixed, and the endpoint is clear. The winners and losers are easily identified.
In infinite games, like business or politics or life itself, the players come and go, the rules are changeable, and there is no defined endpoint. There are no winners or losers in an infinite game; there is only ahead and behind.
The more I started to understand the difference between finite and infinite games, the more I began to see infinite games all around us. I started to see that many of the struggles that organizations face exist simply because their leaders were playing with a finite mindset in an infinite game. These organizations tend to lag behind in innovation, discretionary effort, morale and ultimately performance.
The leaders who embrace an infinite mindset, in stark contrast, build stronger, more innovative, more inspiring organizations. Their people trust each other and their leaders. They have the resilience to thrive in an ever-changing world, while their competitors fall by the wayside. Ultimately, they are the ones who lead the rest of us into the future.
Any worthwhile undertaking starts with Why – the purpose, cause or belief that inspires us to do what we do and inspires others to join us. Good leaders know how to build Circles of Safety that promote trust and cooperation throughout their organizations. But that’s not enough to help us chart a course through the unpredictable, often chaotic landscape of today’s marketplace.
I now believe that the ability to adopt an infinite mindset is a prerequisite for any leader who aspires to leave their organization in better shape than they found it.Age Range: Adult
用戶評價
一點點connect瞭我這些年都在思考的dots。
評分##Fulfill, not win. 從Designing your life過來的，那本書有一節就是讓大傢明白人生是無限遊戲，而非互相攀比的有限遊戲。這本書主要是以商業公司角度談瞭無限遊戲，穿插一些個人成長相關的內容（Sinek和Grant互相攀比真是笑死我）。 最受用的一段就是蘋果大佬聽說微軟齣瞭比iPod更好用的競爭品，淡淡地說“不錯嘛”（真的不是品牌宣傳嗎？？）。這種“我在追求更長遠的目標，所以現在落後於某個群體並非意料之外，也不會影響我的計劃”的淡然，素晴素晴！ 關鍵詞：worthy rival、just cause（積極支持、包容、長遠、利他、理想主義）。 小問題：以品牌/CEO為單位分析有些過於非黑即白。而且聽瞭黑天鵝以後，感覺很多（一切）因果關係的推斷都站不住腳。。
評分##公司townhall聽到有人提這本書 好奇看完瞭 理念是好的 long term view, just cause, do the right thing怎麼說都是對的 大公司裏挑齣來好例子做proof也不難 但mkt看重的performance efficiency 不是所有公司都有一樣的機會convince wall street 沒上市的公司還靈活些 對patagonia大增 到個人層麵 差不多就是growth mindset 有意思的是作者提到瞭他的worthy rival是adam grant 差距還是有些大的吧
評分一點點connect瞭我這些年都在思考的dots。
評分##有些不錯的內容，就絮絮叨叨的案例看得沒耐心。 Money is not the purpose, but the result.
評分##假大空。couldn’t even finish.
評分##持續堅持公司的使命和願景。作者用瞭Just cause。 如何看待競爭。worthy rivals instead of competitors。 finite thinking：win infinite thinking：stay in the game
評分##公司townhall聽到有人提這本書 好奇看完瞭 理念是好的 long term view, just cause, do the right thing怎麼說都是對的 大公司裏挑齣來好例子做proof也不難 但mkt看重的performance efficiency 不是所有公司都有一樣的機會convince wall street 沒上市的公司還靈活些 對patagonia大增 到個人層麵 差不多就是growth mindset 有意思的是作者提到瞭他的worthy rival是adam grant 差距還是有些大的吧
評分##追求長遠價值而不是短期利益。那怎麼保證在位時間足夠長？要有一個能讓大傢都認同的cause。書裏應該把鋼鐵俠幫助人類殖民火星的cause也放進去。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.teaonline.club All Rights Reserved. 圖書大百科 版權所有